I'll jump in with two comments. First, we should be trying to avoid duplication in review. That's inefficient. I don't think it's in anyone's interest. Second, we have to recognize that, even where we have a federally regulated project like Trans Mountain, there will be a legitimate provincial interest. I think that provincial interest doesn't amount to a veto, that the province is not in a position to undermine a federal approval, but the process has to be able to take into account legitimate provincial and municipal concerns.
It actually seems to me the Kinder Morgan review process did that. Condition number one of the Trans Mountain certificate is that it's obliged to live by provincial and municipal permits. The challenge has been that Trans Mountain has found that Burnaby has not been acting in good faith in terms of proceeding with the permitting processes.
I haven't really thought that much about the substitution issues, to tell you the truth, Mr. Amos.