Today, we have not discussed to any extent the issue of federal-provincial collaboration in assessments, the issue of appropriateness of substitution, nor the terms upon which equivalency is determined. I want to open this up, particularly to Professor Bankes and to the Pembina representatives. I want to hear your views on how that is most appropriately done.
Fortunately, or unfortunately, we've entered a very politicized environment around the Trans Mountain issue, which has sort of framed the question, but we need to take a step back from that and look more broadly at how we want a coherent federal-provincial assessment regime to function. That's what I'm thinking about now, so I'd love to hear your views on that.