As I said, we have a slightly different situation in that we do not have a co-managed EA process. Substitution is an option for us, but it's not as clear because we don't have a process where the different governments are represented collectively.
Resources are always a challenge. We're a small government, and when we have a big project proposed and there are three or possibly more processes.... In the worst case scenario, there was a project proposed two years ago. We spent 18 months trying to negotiate a harmonization agreement with the provincial and federal governments. We were unsuccessful. Without a harmonization agreement, it would have been subject to five simultaneous environmental impact processes. The proponent then rejigged their project to avoid us, to reduce the number of EA processes they would have to go through, and then ultimately went bankrupt. That's not an efficient way to do it. The resourcing for us to contribute to five processes is very challenging.