You said that a number of improvements should be made to the new act, but you also said that it needs to be rewritten. I would be inclined to choose the second option.
I will now turn to Chief Maureen Thomas.
I found your comments and philosophy very interesting. You said that we have to take action to protect our children. That has a very maternal ring to it. I am a father and I will be very paternalistic by adding that we must protect not only our children, but also our grandchildren. I think that is important. We need robust legislation that also balances economic development with sustainable development. We need to act to protect our children and for the sound financial management of our country.
You said that every small improvement counts. I agree, but we might as well do as much as possible to improve the situation. We could make small improvements, as a minimum, but I think we are able to make huge strides. It takes a lot of small steps to get anywhere.
I now have a question for your colleague, Mr. Konovsky.
Mr. Konovsky, you talked about a mechanism for recourse to a tribunal, with a right of appeal.
Can you elaborate on this suggested improvement?