In our written testimony, as you will see when you get it, we recommend that there be a new section added to the bill, and that it be broadly construed to allow anyone who has an issue with decision-making, at any stage of the process, to appeal. In our conversations with the government, that has met with some resistance in terms of such a broad-based kind of mechanism.
Our bottom line is that in those lists of factors, constitutionally protected indigenous rights are unique. They need unique protection. In a new proposed section 62 or 63, perhaps, there should be a provision specifically for that kind of appeal should there be infringement or the threat of infringement. That's our bottom line. We agree with the idea of a tribunal as being the best solution, but if the committee doesn't want to go there, that's really the baseline we need in order to be satisfied with the bill.