In theory, the courts are there to ensure compliance with statutory requirements. That's their traditional function on judicial review. The courts are there to provide some level of judicial oversight. The problem is that when you leave these things in very vague terms, the courts are reluctant to intervene.
I can tell you this because I've been chewed up and spit out by the Federal Court a few times on these kinds of issues. Where on behalf of our clients we've gone to court and we've indicated to the court that there was little or no evidence to support a finding or a conclusion, the court said, “You know what? They've mentioned the word 'need', or 'purpose', or 'alternatives', so at least they've cast their mind to that issue. They've given it some consideration, so we're not prepared to intervene.” That, unfortunately—