Okay. I really wanted to go into that consultation issue and the “expectation of a response” issue, because I think it's an important one. I would simply say that it has to be very difficult in this kind of process for government and expert panels to respond to every single comment that is made. It's a Herculean task.
My question goes to Mr. Lindgren, because we've had an ongoing discussion with a number of witnesses on the issue of review, judicial or tribunal, of this process. Given that a quasi-judicial model has not been chosen for the impact assessment agency, is there a way in your estimation to craft a provision or set of provisions that would enable engaging that form of tribunal?
Also, is there language you might suggest that would enable that kind of process in such a way that it does not overload and overweigh the system, and in such a way that it might even help lighten the federal court system, which is ultimately also available?