My questions will be to Mr. Watson.
It's great to see you. We worked together a lot in Alberta on the Clean Air Strategic Alliance, which we both worked very positively with, and we recommend, at the federal level, bringing everybody together.
We've heard mostly about the first part of Bill C-69, but of course there is a second part, and that is the new Canadian energy regulator. A number of recommendations have been made both for the impact assessment part and the Canadian energy regulator.
One of the recommendations that some of the witnesses are suggesting, and frankly that the expert panel recommended, is that rather than ad hoc panels, there should be a full-time tribunal.
Given your experience both in Alberta and as the head of National Energy Board, do you think there is an advantage to having a full-time tribunal that develops the expertise to hear those hearings, or do you think you would be able to deliver the same responsibilities effectively with people appointed ad hoc to panels?