Maybe I'll mention some of the things that we have already begun doing. I believe they're consistent with and supported by Bill C-69.
We recognized some time ago that we needed to be more proactive with our engagement with stakeholders across the country and participants in our hearing processes. Engagement with Canadians is necessary and appropriate, and we note that this feature is enabled and expected under Bill C-69.
I think regulators can also take steps to increase transparency associated with what they do. I would point to one of the initiatives that has been taken on both the Trans Mountain expansion and the Line 3 replacement project with our indigenous monitoring and advisory committees, where we're working collaboratively with them to be completely transparent regarding our activities on life-cycle oversight and how things are done that actually ensure safety and reduce harm associated with the potential effects of an operating pipeline.
Through that process, we're learning how to work better together and engage within first nations and the Métis Nation to ensure that we're really transparent and effective in our engagement with them, particularly around life-cycle oversight matters.
There are a number of things that I think we've been attempting to do, and I see that they will be able to be continued as we move forward.