I think that's critical. As a general comment, I would say that the greatest risk I see to projects from any kind of assessment or regulatory process is the uncertainty that is associated with the loss of social licence, and environmental assessments are an opportunity to gain that social licence.
As I mentioned earlier, aquaculture is an example where we did a strategic assessment in Nova Scotia. We did the same with tidal energy. There was strong opposition to both ideas when we started. Through an effective engagement process with all interested parties, we came to common ground. We identified what the legitimate concerns were, and we found a way to get them addressed.
Ultimately, the end product is that good projects can go ahead, and there's more certainty as a result of that than you would have if you had a shorter, firm process, but then all kinds of uncertainty at the end of the process because of litigation and political opposition to the project. There are hundreds of examples of that.