Okay, I'm not getting an answer to my question. I have very little time left and I have some specific questions for the Department of Transport officials.
There has been deep concern expressed that there is no linkage between part 1 and part 3 of the bill and that there is no requirement to consider navigation in these environmental assessments. That concern was also expressed by indigenous intervenors who said that in many cases they need access to marshes and so forth that could be dewatered by projects, and there's no requirement to consider those.
Is there a reason why there is no linkage between the two parts or the bill?