I think you've answered this question already, but I want to get clarification. Would you say that a review panel without the relevant regulator would be an incomplete panel that would not serve the public interest? In other words, would such a panel be a disservice to the public interest? I ask this because we've had witnesses suggest that they should not be involved at all, that there should be a black-and-white separation.
On May 3rd, 2018. See this statement in context.