That would be a big mistake. I believe we received the bulk of the amendments this past Thursday. There are 400 of them—400—and we're supposed to know exactly which ones are common and should be passed in sort of a smaller omnibus motion, and which ones should be done individually...? It's unreasonable. We are going to end up with a really sloppy product. This has been a sloppy process as it is, but to have a sloppy product at the end of that process would be a travesty, because of the importance of this legislation, so could I please ask that we go through this clause by clause by clause, with no grouping of amendments? We deal with them per clause and in order.
On May 8th, 2018. See this statement in context.