I have completely opposite issues.
I'm concerned, Ms. May, that you are watering down those obligations. Right now it says, “must take into account”, and all of our witnesses were saying please replace “by considering” with “take into account”. I'm puzzled why you'd take that out.
Also, it already references matters within federal jurisdiction. You have listed some of those, but there may well be matters under federal jurisdiction that are not included in that list, and so it may be less of a responsibility than as it stands now.