I remain concerned about this, because there are strange things in this bill. For example, under this bill, the minister cannot refer a matter to a panel if an authority has already made a decision. That raises this question: why would an authority be allowed to make a decision before the decision is made about whether there needs to be an impact assessment?
That doesn't give me any assurance. The question then would be, why didn't she refer it to a panel? Why does she allow them to go first ? That doesn't give me the assurance—