Thank you.
This is another way of dealing with the same problem by deleting lines 14 to 16 on page 122. The effect is that the regulator is not prevented from publishing reports. So, it's not the same thing. I mean, it's public information as opposed to just climate information.
The goal here—perhaps the Conservatives will support me on this—is to ensure that the regulator has not just a possibility, but the duty, to publish without the minister's consent. We want a body that's open and transparent. Why should a body like the Canadian energy regulator need the minister's consent to publish its reports?