That's correct.
It is word for word the same as proposed section 82, but instead of saying “federal lands”, it would say “on non-federal lands”.
On May 22nd, 2018. See this statement in context.
Linda Duncan NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
That's correct.
It is word for word the same as proposed section 82, but instead of saying “federal lands”, it would say “on non-federal lands”.
See context to find out what was said next.