There doesn't seem to be a quick shortcut in any case. For northern Europe, the European Union generally I would say, this was not as difficult a conversation to have because energy prices were already very high relative to Canada, where we have some of the cheapest electricity on earth. It's very hard to convince people it needs to change when that's the case.
If you look at the specific case of Germany.... One of the things I would hasten to mention is that nobody is doing this perfectly. Even in the German example, which I've written about very positively, for domestic political reasons they've chosen to maintain their fleet of coal-fired power plants, which has not been good for their emissions profile, mainly because nuclear power is that much of a political third rail in Germany. Even in the German example, probably the strongest difference between where that conversation began in Germany or where it got to very quickly, and where it hasn't yet gone here, is that it was immediately seen as an opportunity to create new jobs, to build a new industry. Even when government changed and Angela Merkel's conservative government first came into power, they were not big fans of the energy transition but quickly realized there were just too many Germans benefiting from it for them to not support it on some level.
I think there's presenting it as an opportunity for industrial growth and economic growth as well as a way to tackle a major environmental problem.