It's a double negative in and of itself, isn't it?
I guess what I'm trying to get at here is that you have to take a multi-faceted approach in order to achieve our Paris accord target: our investments in transit and innovation, in infrastructure, mitigation through waste water, our emissions controls around methane and vehicle emissions, and finally, putting a price on pollution becomes the cap on top of it all towards moving to achieve our Paris targets.
Would you agree that having a multi-faceted approach, once again, looking at the political reality of just having a price on pollution only, for achieving our Paris targets?