To follow up on that, we look at the regulatory environment or the policy measures that could be taken to benefit, and I think that, as a government, we've recognized that you need to use a broad range, a broad basket, of different policy measures in order to achieve our targets, but it has shown, as you said, that the regulatory side is far more expensive.
Would you agree that it doesn't send as clear a signal to the market of the intention of meeting our targets around climate change and GHG emissions?