It's an interesting question. I sat on the Pathway to Canada Target 1 committee, which looked at ways to get to 17%. One thing I would start with is that I think there's more conservation taking place within working landscapes than currently gets credit or gets counted. When you look at the forest sector, significant portions of our managed land are in some form of conservation right now, whether it be riparian areas, wildlife management areas, or so on.
I think you want to recognize what you were probably hearing from folks at the Canadian Forest Service around the systems approach. The real benefit of wood and storing carbon is that the tree stores the carbon, but the product stores the carbon as well. If we look at it in terms of full systems, we want to make sure we're utilizing the wood that we are extracting from the forest. We're replanting those forests and getting trees growing again and storing carbon. We want the products we make to be long-lived so that things like tables and tall wood buildings are storing that carbon for decades and centuries. You're really maximizing the benefit of using wood products as well as regrowing those forests, keeping forests in a working landscape so that it can do both. It can provide conservation benefits and it can provide carbon storage benefits.