Yes, very much so, with the caveat that we need to understand that this is all in regard to a carbon cycle. If you're going to price pollution on one hand, or carbon, you need to give credit where you're sequestering carbon, whether it's in forestry products that are used in building materials, whether it's agricultural products that are exported around the world. We're also a trade-exposed industry in agriculture. In the province that I represent for my day job, in Alberta, 85% of the four major crops that we produce are for export destinations. We still remain the breadbasket of the world out in the Prairies. So yes, absolutely it would be....
We would be remiss, though, if we did not include all of the ecosystem services that we do provide with everything we're doing, from the type of conservation tillage practices that have been adopted and the mitigation strategies. To give you an indication, we've gone to producing three times as much food with the same amount of inputs in less than 25 years.