Hans, I want to thank you for the work you did in Nelson. It's a lovely town that values its heritage and its heritage buildings. Thank you for your part in it. I very much appreciate that.
This is a question for Robert or Kate. One of the suggestions we had when we were doing our study on reaching 10% marine area protection and 17% land protection was that 50% of the boreal forest potentially should or could be set aside for conservation purposes. I'd be curious to hear your view. It's interesting to think of forests in terms of the value of carbon sequestration compared with the actual timber value of a tree. It has value either way. What do you think of that concept of conserving 50% of the boreal forest from both an economic and a climate change perspective?