I think we have to go back to the dedication clause of national parks. They're dedicated to the people of Canada for their use, enjoyment, and education but in a way that leaves them unimpaired. I think in the Government of Canada that's the responsibility of the minister.
If I go back to the commissioner's report on cultural integrity, that confirms that Parks Canada—again, I'm not giving you inside information, because it's public information—was meeting our obligation under the act. Recreational activities have been and will always been debated. It's going to be a debate 50 years from now. I think the issue for me is that, again, the commissioner reviewed the recreational activities and confirmed that cultural integrity was seriously considered and the first priority in the processes of the agency, so I would recommend that you may want to look at the commissioner's report and the specific section on that.
I think that, in Canada, there are several parks that have no commercial development at all, more than the vast majority of them. I think there are a lot of opportunities for Canadians. Look at northern Canada, for example. There's a unique opportunity for Canadians to experience Inuit culture, so it's not only about nature but also indigenous cultures. I think that's something we should be pursuing as a country.