I can speak from my watershed perspective. While appreciating the fact that we get funding from the federal government for wetland protection and infrastructure, from our conservation authorities' perspective, we look at trying to protect the wetland before it gets destroyed. So, leave it intact. I'll say restrict development from impacting that development by keeping it outside of the boundaries, so it can function as it was meant to. My point of view would be that it would be better left intact and not to have to reinvent it after it's been impacted.
On June 3rd, 2019. See this statement in context.