I read about the program. It focuses heavily on self-assessment and it seems that there are very few external assessments. The external assessment data that we can find is based on previous self-assessments, which I find interesting.
If you look at one company's last TSM progress report, they don't have any formalized reporting or communications around biodiversity at all. They admit to having conservation management as part of their closure plans, but nothing really for the duration of the operations. In all of the reports, “biodiversity conservation management” is extremely vague.
During your comments, you spoke about performance indicators and public reporting. Do you feel this is good enough? Are you getting better?