Thank you. I'm Wayne Stetski, from the riding of Kootenay—Columbia. I'd like to start by recognizing Teck's contribution to conservation in my riding.
For questions, I'll start with West Coast Environmental Law and the Canadian Wildlife Federation. We've heard fairly consistent messaging from witnesses that we need a national long-term vision for Canada beyond the 10% and 17% targets, so where do we want to be with conservation in the long term in Canada? We've also heard that we'll need federal government leadership and coordination on reaching the 10% and 17% targets, so we need a coordinating model that will get us there. It could be similar to the health accord model we have in place.
The third thing is the challenge in deciding what should be in and out for reaching those targets. Should it be quantity or quality, and how do we decide what should be in and out? We've heard a bit about IUCN classifications. The Canadian Council on Ecological Areas has a classification system.
I'm interested, and I'll start with the environmental law association. Is there a model out there that you've seen that you think we could be applying to decide what should be in and out of the total targets of 10% and 17%?