I want to say you got to the heart of it. There is a fundamental difference between a hazard-based system and a risk-based system. It sounds great to say that we don't want any hazards in our environment, but every single substance out there has the potential to be a hazard.
If you just base a system on hazard, you could always find a reason not to have it there. That's why every hazard has to have the context of exposure to know what we're managing.
It is a fundamental difference, and every system that has worked in the world and been effective has been based on risk and not hazard. It is important, and it is a fundamental difference. I'll just say quickly that if you look at the cup of coffee you may drink, there are many substances in it that are carcinogens, but we wouldn't say that we're not going to drink coffee. We have to have some context to it.