It doesn't come last per se. The legislation does provide for a certain degree of protection, but it's not perhaps the protection that Canadians might want if they were presented with the full array of facts. There are other issues as well with this kind of insolvency, of course. There are pensions. There is the maintaining of a business as a going concern, which is obviously an economic and sustainable development consideration. We can't be blind to the fact that it's not just about the environment.
However, I think the decision merits review by the legislature. I don't see it in any of the mandate letters right now. It's not a high-profile issue but it is an important one, and I think that sometimes legislators in committees such as these need to take the bull by the horns, recognize where there may be a public interest, and determine whether we can do something about it and bring it to the attention of the legislature and the relevant ministers. It wouldn't be just for the environment minister, of course. This would be for Finance. This would be for Innovation. I think this is a whole-of-government concern. How do you deal with companies that are on the downturn in a context where they've been operating for many years in industries that are polluting?
I'll leave it at that. That's a lot of substance.