That's a good question. You can tie this exact shortcoming that you identify with respect to the regulation of BPA to the fact that there is an exposure requirement in section 64. Basically what happened on the BPA assessment is that the evidence was good, quite strong, that at very low doses—and we're exposed to BPA at very low doses—those would be significant in the context of an infant because of the lower body weight, but those low doses wouldn't be significant in the context of a grown person. That was the finding from the risk assessment. What that allowed the government to do was to craft a risk management measure that focused only on baby bottles even though that fell short, as we mentioned, because those same infants are going to still be exposed to BPA if they are breastfeeding.
On June 9th, 2016. See this statement in context.