Wonderful.
I'm going to spend most of my time directing questions to Ms. Morin.
Thank you for being part of this discussion. I appreciate the fact that you emphasized both science and traditional knowledge as being critical to making informed decisions. I took note of your comments as you were discussing the environmental review process, and I think I have your quote right, “the information that is being presented by the first nations gets limited consideration”.
You didn't get a chance to expand on that too much, and I invite you to do that.
What is that a function of? Is it the fact that due consideration isn't being given to first nations' input? Is it related to an unwillingness or an inability by the regulator to receive that information? Is it a function of traditional knowledge not being properly defined within the act itself? When I say the act, I mean CEPA. Could you expand a little on what you meant?