They're both comparable. Ontario has 1,295 facilities reporting on the NPRI, and Ohio has 1,465 facilities, and yet Ontario's on-site air releases of carcinogens is almost double that of Ohio's, with 3.4 million kilograms versus 1.8 million kilograms. I wanted to point that out.
We've been talking a lot about risk versus hazards based assessment, and I like where Mr. Jessop is coming from, and even Dayna Scott, another witness last week, who had gone along the same path of it isn't one or the other. There needs to be a full life-cycle analysis that is done.
I'd like you to describe the process of looking at it from a risk versus a hazard based assessment that would be done in a life-cycle analysis. Would you agree with that?