The risk assessment, but what about taking a hazards-based assessment approach? Would you say that, if another body, a world body, through REACH or the EPA, finds that a chemical is hazardous and toxic, it should be mandatory that an assessment be done on that product immediately? That is one instance. On the other hand, where we start to see these indications, should a hazards-based approach be taken to look at where those vulnerable populations could be impacted?
On June 14th, 2016. See this statement in context.