I'm going to pick up, I hope, where Mr. Amos left off.
Mr. Bush and Mr. Doyle, I almost want to suggest we call this the myth-buster study because of something that you referred to in terms of where Canada stands vis-à-vis the United States, for example. I think the myth in Canada is that our regulations in all cases at all times are better and at a more elevated level than those of our trading partners. I think, Mr. Doyle, you suggested that weak oversight, that if there were a spill in the U.S., the consequences would look dramatically different than if in Canada, and that some of that regulation with incentive has led to innovations just on the waste management within the agriculture community.
Is what I have said correct so far?