My concern is this— and I'm simply editorializing here. If the choice of which products will be available for production and use and sale in Canada is made by government, we're now talking Big Brother. We're talking about an Orwellian approach. That's something you won't see our side of the table favouring at all.
If you can provide me with greater detail on exactly what you meant by those suggestions, I'd be glad to consider them.
My questions for Mr. Khosla, though, are focused on Ms. Diamond's testimony. She recommended a number of areas of improvement for CEPA. One was that we should be adopting a more rigorous precautionary approach—you may want to make a note of that—and second, that environmental justice principles should be incorporated that address a broader array of vulnerable populations. Third, the NPRI needs to be updated for thresholds in substances, and that there's a responsibility on industry to provide better and more data.
Do you disagree with any of those in principle? If so, why? If not, could you expand a little bit?