To that as well I would add the precautionary principle. Indeed, you spoke earlier about REACH and how new data is becoming available on an ongoing basis, and about the no data, no market type of direction they've taken with REACH, and about other OECD countries.
Would you agree that if we want to really take the precautionary principle when this new data becomes available, we shouldn't necessarily be as prescriptive as to say that we're going to follow that data fully and virtually eliminate or add that chemical to the toxic list, but that there should be a mandatory assessment based on that new data?