I think it requires a reversal of the onus. If a community wants to protect the lands that have supported them, we should get out of their way, and frankly, everything has been in their way, so that is a new approach to be taken.
You can award a significant discovery licence in perpetuity, which then blocks in perpetuity other uses for those areas. It just does not make sense.
I think the reversal of the relationship and having a true crown-to-Inuit or crown-to-first nation relationship would require reversing that approach and trusting the people who are on the land.