That's a broad question. I would say mostly yes, but I have to put that in context.
Based on a reconciliation perspective, I totally support the 50/50 partnership. The question we have to take into consideration, and it's more related to fisheries management than marine conservation targets or a marine protected area, is that when we manage a species, we have to take care of not only a certain area, but also sometimes a larger area. We see the impact of fishing in one area versus the impact on another area and the impact of climate change with fish moving from one season to another. To say that we can isolate in a certain area and have co-management totally 50/50 will be difficult. On the other hand—