As a follow-up to that, this question is budgetary in nature. It's my understanding that the amount provided in budget 2016 for national park establishment was somewhere in the neighbourhood of $25 million. I'm not sure what the budget for the establishment of a national wildlife area or a migratory bird sanctuary area is, but I am aware that the amounts for the natural area conservation plan, the NACP you mentioned before, are far more significant.
Number one, is that, in your opinion, the appropriate weighting of investments?
Number two, is it fair to say that with more significant federal investments, whether it's in NWAs, migratory bird protected areas, or national parks, that we could move more quickly, more expeditiously, and more successfully toward protected areas across the board at Environment Canada?