First of all, as my colleague explained, Health Canada, which assesses health risks, already does consider vulnerable populations. Of course, as members of Parliament, you may want to provide for more certainty that it will be done.
Putting it in the preamble would provide some general guidance but no mandatory obligations. Is that strong enough? Putting it in the statute would establish an obligation, so we could ensure that Mr. Morin's successor continues his good work and doesn't leave it up to his successor. On the other hand, a possible unintended consequence could be that you would then require assessments in every case to look at vulnerable populations, even when we don't need to do that to make a decision that the substance is problematic. We can stop the assessment, and we can move on to controlling the substance, so that's a consideration.
Do you want to add anything?