No. I fully anticipate it will get to the Supreme Court of Canada.
I typically take a conservative approach to new legal claims. I've often turned down cases that look.... I can point to five or six different examples within CEPA that I would take on right now as cases. They're existing section 15 violations within the act, right now.
An example is assessing vulnerability or exposure based on the average person in a way that doesn't protect children. I think the parents of asthmatic children who have lost their lives have a very strong claim right now under CEPA.
I think the best thing to do is to do the right thing. Effectuate environmental justice. No one is suggesting environmental perfection, just that we shouldn't have these huge disparities in protection.