I understand the efficiency, but it has to be balanced by fairness. The problem with not being able to use the due diligence defence is that there are times when any rational Canadian would agree this decision is unfair, but it's found liability.
I've seen a number of instances of that. I'm not criticizing you for that. I believe we need AMPs as a tool, but they have to be administered in a fair and sensitive way. That's all I'm saying.