Thanks.
I'm curious about what's happening with equivalency on the ground, and the reasons.
I also have to say that I am disappointed. I requested that there be a regional officer here. It's good to hear that headquarters thinks that everything is okay. Perhaps that wasn't passed on to you, but it was my specific request, and it was specifically for that reason. It would have been good to get the assurance. Often, officers on the ground have very different kinds of interests than headquarters types do. I'm hoping at some future time that we can talk to them.
I'm curious to know about what the relationships are now with the provincial enforcement officers, and what role equivalency is playing in that. Recently, there was a co-operative prosecution in the oil sands, and that was pretty unique. Most of the time, what I have witnessed is that the federal government has backed off and the province has proceeded.
Can you tell me a bit about what is happening on the ground now with actual enforcement for violations found under CEPA?