None of this addresses what I see as the ongoing concerns. When I became the chief, these were exactly the kinds of concerns that were expressed. It's troubling to me. When I left that office, I recommended it become a separate enforcement division, and I'm glad to see that happened.
The reason for that was that there were a lot of problems with interference by headquarters and because of relationships between regional directors, and their priority was to maintain relations with the provinces and the territories. When I read about these concerns and the fact that they are continuing, my next question to you would be who makes the decision on whether there will be an enforcement action initiated? Is it the officers on the ground, or is it a political decision at headquarters?