I'm going to try to. Thank you, Madam Chair.
I have a quick question.
Ms. Meroni, you made the comment earlier about how proactive work is essentially planned inspection activity, predicated on risk-based planning, as well as informed through intelligence, which establishes national and regional priorities and projects.
My question is twofold. One, how do you establish that? Do you establish that through phytotoxicity reports, human health risk assessments, site-specific risk assessments, environmental assessments, one and two? That said, my second question would be how you then deal with that. Are you then into a remediation stage? Are you then into a stage of responding accordingly if in fact those health risk assessments show something?
I'm going to try to get all my questions in here, because I have only so much time.
My third question is, with respect to that, for the contaminants of concern that may not have science attached to them, science has to be established, and there's a certain parts per million level already established. Let's say it's 200 ppm; if in fact there's no science for that contaminant, that's the usual amount. When the science is then created, and I'm assuming you would do that, the ppm level is changed. Thus I go back to my second question: what's then done about it?
My last question is what happens when all that is contained within federal lands?