I won't put them in that uncomfortable position. I will try not to, at least.
What I've heard so far, though, from Ms. Meroni is that there are specific mechanisms that are provided for in statutes, some mandatory and some not, which require a certain type of reporting—say, annual reports—and that the energies and the resources that are available are directed toward those required reporting mechanisms or those non-mandatory but statutorily suggested reports. That is why we don't have some other form of reporting, like an augmented publicly available database.
Now, Ms. McCready has mentioned that there is a new database system coming online soon. This is in reference to the NEMISIS system, which is a behind-the-curtain system not available to the public but available if you “access to information” it. As we all know, though, the access to information record of Environment Canada has been challenged in the past.
What I don't understand is why the enforcement branch can't update NEMISIS so that there is a public-facing side that enables access to publicly available information that could be accessed if there were ATIP. If there's a need to protect certain private information, why can't that be kept in a protected space? The United States does that. The United States has across-the-board integrated enforcement information, and we don't. We're upgrading our internal database, and that's good news.