All right.
I'm looking at the actual conclusions that you set out in your report. One, of course, was that the board was not adequately tracking company implementation of pipeline approval conditions or consistently following up on deficiencies in company compliance.
Then there was a concern about the information management systems that were used for those purposes. Are those tracking systems, which you suggest were outdated and inefficient—we're not challenging that at all—directly related to the shortcomings of the tracking and follow-up on company deficiencies?