What I'm surprised by is that in this most crucial aspect.... The conditions are crucial; they're integral. They are what the government and the regulator hold up to give the public assurances. So when the auditor comes by to say you're tracking those integral conditions and you folks have to go and find manual tracking, your systems are outdated; they're inadequate. You're reviewing something that poses such an obvious and inherent risk when it fails—not just in Kalamazoo, but the Nexen spill of two summers ago.
My question is simply this. Do you have confidence that you will be able to 100% track all of the conditions that are being applied, and by when?