A philosophy that's based in your audit and the way that a regulator works is that the burden of proof is not on the public to prove a pipeline is unsafe. The burden of proof is on the proponent to prove that it is safe. Is that fair?
Nathan Cullen NDP Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
A philosophy that's based in your audit and the way that a regulator works is that the burden of proof is not on the public to prove a pipeline is unsafe. The burden of proof is on the proponent to prove that it is safe. Is that fair?
See context to find out what was said next.