Thank you.
I am going to rule. You're not going to be happy with me, but I'm going to rule that it's inadmissible. The reason I'm going to rule that it's inadmissible is that in the House of Commons Procedures and Practice, second edition, on page 766, it states:
An amendment to a bill must be relevant in that it must always relate to the subject matter of the bill or to the clause thereof under consideration.
You're actually addressing a different clause that is about the management of the park, which is not actually discussed in Bill C-18. I know you're not going to be happy with me, but that's my ruling.
I'm now moving to clause 2 and CPC-1.
It's not really debatable if I do a ruling.